Piers Morgan, the tabloid “journalist” who briefly was on CNN before we ran him out of America, is once again ranting about gun control in the US. His tabloid experience allowed him to come up with a sufficiently lurid title: A Math Question For The US Media: What’s Going to Kill More American Kids This Year? Ebola or Guns?
Answering that directly, there’s no way to tell. It’s only October 28th and President Obama’s stunning lack of leadership and incredibly bad choices may yet result in an “Ebola Apocalypse Christmas” here in the US.
But Piers doesn't really care about that, this is just another case of his impassioned fury that in America people are allowed to own guns. And, like all anti-gun liberals, his favorite argument is “guns are killing children.” Really? Let me present some facts supporting my assertion that you don’t actually give a crap about “the children.” According to the CDC, unintentional injury is the leading cause of death for children between the ages of 1 and 4. Drilling down further, for children 1 – 4 accidental drowning is the leading cause of death. So, where are the calls to outlaw private pool ownership? Nonexistent, despite the fact that nobody “needs” to own a pool. Where are the calls for mandatory 24-7 lifeguards, paid for by the pool’s owner? Or even just mandatory fencing? Nary a mention.
For kids 5 – 24 automobile accidents are the leading cause of death. So, why are people allowed to own (or drive) their own car? Alternatives do exist- everyone could take the bus, train, bicycle, or just walk. Think of all the children we could save by outlawing pools and cars!
Of course, I’m certainly not the first to point all this out. It’s a frequent talking-point among those who support the basic human right to self-defense. And, of course, it’s a point that anti-gunners like Piers Morgan blithely ignore.
Morgan trots out another assertion: That following the Dunblane Massacre in 1996, the UK almost completely outlawed guns. And following this wise, sensible action, they all lived happily ever. Of course, it’s just not true. Perhaps he should actually read the very publication that now employs him. They report that England has seen an unbelievable 89% increase in gun violence since outlawing guns. Which really shouldn't surprise anyone- now the only people with guns are the criminals. But, in typical liberal fashion, he tries to spin his away around that unpleasant reality by grandly proclaiming “we haven’t had a single school shooting since guns were outlawed!” What he fails to mention is that they hadn't had a single school shooting before the Dunblane Massacre, either. But they did have the Cumbria Shootings just four years ago with 14 shot dead. Wow, that gun control is sooo effective!
Finally, Piers treats us to the liberal’s standard smug moral superiority line of “permitting gun ownership is so uncivilized.” Really? OK, Piers, let me show you what “uncivilized” really looks like:
That’s some innocent person being forced to strip by a criminal at the height of the London Riots. Would you like another?